Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Presumed facts
A. Plaintiff A is the owner of 1,544 square meters prior to F (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s dry field”), and Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the owner of E large 536 square meters adjacent to the dry field on the Plaintiff’s side (hereinafter “instant land”).
B. On August 22, 2013, Plaintiff B resided in the instant disputing land and the Plaintiff’s dry field with a 43.35 square meters of a boom roof (hereinafter “instant housing”). Around 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit to remove the instant housing against Plaintiff B (this Court Decision 2013Gadan1109) and filed a voluntary conciliation (hereinafter “related conciliation”) with the following content.
1) The Plaintiff B delivers the instant house to the Defendant. The Defendant did not object to the Plaintiff’s possession of a part of the dry field on the Plaintiff’s side according to the delivery of the instant house. 2) The Defendant installed a container (standard 4m x 8m; hereinafter “instant container”) on the part agreed between the Plaintiff B and the Defendant, and delivered it to the Plaintiff B. 3) The Plaintiff used the electric facilities installed on the instant house to transfer the instant container to the instant container, used the wells located on the instant disputed land as they are, and 4) the Plaintiff B used the instant disputed land, the Plaintiff’s dry field on the Plaintiff’s side, and the roads surrounding H forest for the convenience of the Plaintiff B, and the Defendant did not object to the Plaintiff’s farming shed.
C. The Defendant: (a) remodeled the instant housing upon delivery from Plaintiff B; and (b) leased it to a third party.
From April 2015, the Defendant installed a hump shield by connecting the dispute land of this case, which is the part of the boundary of the Plaintiff’s dry field, with a straight line, which is the part of the boundary of the Plaintiff’s dry field. The instant dispute land is a cover that connects each point of 22 and 9 indicated in the annexed drawing in sequence (hereinafter “instant hump”).
E. Of the dispute land in this case, each point of the attached drawings 14, 23 through 26, 5 through 9, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, and 14 are indicated.