1. The Defendant: (a) from April 19, 2015, to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 2,000,000, KRW 1,000,000, and each of the above amounts.

1. In addition to the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the verification of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4 and Nos. 8, and Gap evidence Nos. 11 of this Court, the defendant, around April 19, 2015, operated D A's 13:30 on April 19, 2015, and operated on the National Road No. 27, which was operated along the above two-lanes of the above road, while driving on the National Road No. 13:5, the defendant tried to change the two-lanes to the two-lanes of the plaintiff's 1:4, which had been operated in accordance with the two-lanes of the above road, by using the two-lanes of the plaintiff's vehicle No. 1; the defendant tried to change the two-lanes of the plaintiff's vehicle No. 1; and the plaintiff's two-lanes of the defendant's two-lanes of the two-lanes of the defendant's two-lanes of the plaintiff's vehicle.

According to the above facts, since the defendant's act of intimidation in this case constitutes a tort against the plaintiffs, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff A’s assertion of Plaintiff A as active damage is very mental due to the Defendant’s instant intimidation.