beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B. Defendant A is a kind of work, and it is between D and D with the knowledge of peace.
On June 8, 2017, at around 03:00, the Defendants expressed that the victim D (n, 46 years of age) and the victim talked about the money borrowed from the Defendant A, while the victim talked about the money, Defendant B was able to give an appraisal, and Defendant B was able to take the head debt of the victim by hand, and the face was able to take hand, and Defendant A was able to take the face of the victim by hand, and Defendant A was able to inflict an injury on the victim, such as catum fat, which requires treatment for about 21 days.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant B's partial statement
1. Recording of witness D's statement in the fourth public trial protocol;
1. The defendant A asserts that the investigation report (the submission of a medical certificate of injury) (the defendant A only stated fighting with the words of fighting, and there is no time to do so).
When considering the overall situation at the time, the fact that the defendant A made a fighting itself is recognized.
In that case, although D was called to be the "place", it was not the removal of the body, but the side was followed at the time. At the time, the Defendants and D did not appear in the room, and Defendant B and D made a statement to the effect that they are not only Defendant A because they were in a situation where they were head debt in both hands and hand.
D Specifically stated the situation at the time and, in particular, she was found to have been mixed with the appraisal, and experienced in light of the fact that she made the statement to her degree of response.
I seem to appear.
Witness G was the defendant A when he entered the place.
He stated that he is not a memory that he was at the time of Defendant A.
Although G and H made a statement, their statements cannot be deemed to be inconsistent with D's statements because both G and H were not witnessed from the beginning, but from the middle to the middle.
D. In other words, it is suspected that the statements are false.