beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who actually operates F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) with its head office and factory in Chungcheong-gun E, and Defendant B is a person who is registered as a representative of “G”, a company located in the same place as Defendant A’s children.
1. Defendant A
A. Around March 2013, Defendant A made a false statement to the victim I at the (State) factory of the Chungcheongbuk-gun, Inc., that “A would pay the construction cost in cash to a police officer on April 2013 when the construction work for the relocation of a factory is completed.”
However, the above H plant lease deposit that the FF would recover around the above date and time did not remain due to the overdue rent, and Defendant A had no intent or ability to pay the construction cost even if the injured party was performing construction for the relocation of the F's factory, such as the state of bad credit standing.
Defendant
A In such a manner, A deceiving the victim and let the victim take such action from March 2013 to the Central Police Officer of the same year.
4. Until the Middleman, he had the F factory of this paragraph be transferred to the Cheongbuk-gun E.
As a result, Defendant A had acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 33,01,000 of the pre-factory construction cost by deceiving the victim.
B. On March 3, 2013, F (State) filed a lawsuit seeking payment of KRW 27 million from J to the Incheon District Court (State) on July 3, 2013 on the grounds that it did not pay KRW 27 million out of the price for the production and installation of the steel-frame steel-frame, which was initiated by J, and on November 9, 2013, the said court “F (State) paid KRW 27 million to J and paid interest” was finalized at that time.
Defendant
A As such, as the decision to recommend the settlement has become final and conclusive in the action brought by the J, A is faced with the risk of compulsory execution by the J, and is owned by the F for the purpose of evading compulsory execution.