logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고정991
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On February 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged; (b) on February 16, 2016, within the F shop operated by the Victim E, the victim E of the D located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-si; (c) one male color boom in an amount equivalent to KRW 79,000 in the market price owned by the victim; (d)

A. The Defendant only denied the facts charged that he did not commit a theft, while holding the F Burial and making a report at the public escape room of D itself.

B. CCTV videos and E are written as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case.

According to the CCTV image, the defendant left the store in the state where the victim was in F, and then left the room, and the booms were recorded as his hand. However, according to the photographs submitted by the defendant, the public room in the above F store appears in the public room. Thus, the contents of the above video do not conflict with the defendant's assertion that the contents of the above video did not go to view it as fishery activities in the public room.

E in this Court, “The Defendant left the store and left the store.”

CCTV images located in the vicinity of the public escape room of D were not submitted to investigative agencies and this court.

B. The video made a statement to the effect that the Defendant saw the Defendant as his seat and went to the public room, and that there was a video recording of the entrance of several other customers thereafter, but the D employee did not see it until the face of confirming whether there was oil, etc. in the escape room.

(c)

Thus, as alleged by the defendant, the defendant exceeded his room, and it cannot be ruled out that other customers would have brought about it. Thus, the facts charged in this case is proved without reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the facts charged of this case are crimes.

arrow