logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.08.19 2016고단1388
일반교통방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was driving a motor vehicle with a mast in the middle of the two-lanes located in the top of Ansan City, Ansan-si, Annsan-si on April 4, 2016; (b) the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle.

D even though D demanded a horn to be sounded and turn off, D sent a warning to D while blocking D from proceeding, and reported D to 112.

Defendant continued to make a false statement that “A traffic accident was caused by D who drives a traffic accident,” which could be obstructed by traffic from F, the Defendant demanded the head of the Sinsan Police Station E District Police Station E District of the same way as above, and obstructed the traffic on the land, such as buses and automobiles from time to time entering the said road for about 42 minutes from around 06:07 and blocking the traffic on the road by blocking the passage of the bus and automobiles, etc. passing through the said road, even though he was recommended to make a traffic accident investigation on the road by F.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, where the F did not go to the said road while carrying out the traffic accident investigation on the said road while the F did not go to the said road, and the F does not speak about the official name;

C. The expression “susbling”, and the F may be punished if it continues to take a bath.

F continues to be arrested as a current offender even though the warning was given several times; however, F will be arrested as a current offender.

F with defective hand, and assaulted F's face in drinking times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the general traffic), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) for criminal facts.

arrow