Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 on the 15th day of Ansan-si, Masan-si, Masan apartment, and the 112th day before the Hanyang apartment, that “the taxi customer becomes aware of the fee”, and provided the victim D (28 years old), who was called up, with a large voice called “the flbbbbbb flb flb flb flb flb flb flbb flb flb flb flb flb flb flb flb flb
At the same time, the Defendant continued to have the police officers, including the victim, invited the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, and left the place, left the patrol vehicle, and left the front door once a week, and opened the front door of the patrol vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' property, prevention of crimes and investigation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to patrol cars and video stuffs);
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflect of the defendant, and the degree of interference with the pertinent official duties).