1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with the Hanyang Integrated Logistics Co., Ltd. and the B-owned vehicles (hereinafter “victims”).

D On March 26, 2013, when parking a vehicle E (hereinafter referred to as “fluoring vehicle”) at a parking lot within the middle-to-nick Highway D's parking area located in the area of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building, the building of the building of the building of the building of the building

Therefore, the plaintiff paid 4,892,870 won for physical damage of damaged vehicles.

The defendant shall be liable for the employer as the user of D, and even though the rental car should not drive the instant vehicle to a third party, it shall be liable for the liability of the D and joint tortfeasor due to negligence that caused D to drive the instant vehicle to a third party. Therefore, the plaintiff shall be liable for the above mutual-aid money paid by the plaintiff to the plaintiff.

2. There is no evidence to prove that the Defendant is a user of D, and it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s act of having a siren drive D, even if it could be said that it was negligent for the owner of the damaged vehicle, even if the Defendant’s act of having a siren drive the D.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, each of the claims of this case by the Plaintiff is without merit.