logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.06.09 2015가단50135
건물등철거
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B is listed in the separate sheet No. 16, 17, 18, 19, 16 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 3, Gap evidence Nos. 5, Gap evidence Nos. 6-1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the measurement and appraisal entrustment to the Korea Land Information Corporation, and there is no counter-proof.

On August 6, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer for each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

B. Defendant B owns a building listed in the separate sheet 2 on the ground indicated in the separate sheet No. 1. Among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, part of the above building is 32 square meters in a warehouse connected with each point of 7 m2, 21, 22, 23, and 20 of the separate sheet No. 16, 17, 18, 19, and 16 in sequence among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the part of the above building is 4 m2, 24, 25, 26, 27, 24 and 44 m2, 44, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 47, 47, 45, 47, 47, 47, 47, 47, 545, 47, 57, 47, 47, 545, 47, 5, 47.

C. Defendant C occupies the instant building.

2. According to the facts of the judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim, Defendant B, the owner of the instant building, is obligated to remove the instant building and deliver the site of the instant building to the Plaintiff, the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, as a duty to eliminate interference based on ownership.

In addition, this case.

arrow