logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.08.23 2017고단239
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be the applicant C with the amount of KRW 45,00,000,000, and the compensation shall be the applicant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the effect that “I would receive money in return for a loan of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000 from the next month,” by phoneing to the victim at the Donsan-si, Hasan-si, Seoul; and (b) that I would receive money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and the debt was KRW 170 million, and was paid at least KRW 4,500,000 per month under the pretext of interest, and was thought to use the money borrowed from the victim for personal purposes, such as Internet gambling funds, credit card payments, living expenses, etc., so there was no intention or ability to pay the money properly even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a remittance of KRW 10 million in the name of the borrowed money to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received KRW 45 million from the date to November 26, 2015, as shown in the List of Crimes in the attached Table (1) to the date of November 26, 2015.

2. On April 21, 2016, the Defendant, who committed a crime against the victim E, called the victim at a closed space, will be employed to find a modern automobile by calling to the victim for a well-known fact by the Department of Department I of Hyundai Motor, who requested him to do so.

in order to do so, approximately KRW 25 million is required for advance payment.

D. The phrase “assumed” made a false statement to the effect that “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and the debt was 170 million won or more, and as interest was paid at least 4.5 million won each month, the Defendant did not have any relationship with the Department of Department I of Hyundai Motor Vehicle I, and was thought to be used for personal purposes, such as Internet gambling funds, credit card payments, living expenses, etc. with the money received from the injured party, so there was no intention or ability to have the injured party find employment in Hyundai Motor even if he received the money as advance payment from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant.

arrow