logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.03.21 2016고정958
절도등
Text

Punishment shall be exempted for larceny in the judgment of the defendant, and fine 1,00 for the crime of damaging public documents in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for injury, etc. in the Jinwon District Court's Jinwon District Court's Jinju branch on January 19, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant was found to be in dispute with C, the wife of the thief, who was the wife of the thief, and was in dispute with D, which was the head of the said C, in Sacheon-si, 103 Dong 1501.

On August 25, 2015, the Defendant got sound from the above D apartment, and the victim E was able to fight his body by pushing the Defendant with his hand in order to release the Defendant out of the house. At this time, the victim’s market price in the item of the victim was cut by one gold string, and the floor was lowered.

The defendant did not return to the victim by making the above ging away from the floor, and stolen it.

2. On September 2, 2016, around 14:57, when public documents were damaged, at a meeting room of the attorney-at-law room of the Cheongju Women’s Prison in Cheongju Women’s Prison, the considerable police station F and Senior G G G H were present, and the Defendant investigated the criminal facts under the above paragraph (1) and drafted a suspect examination protocol.

During the inspection of the above suspect interrogation protocol, the defendant stated that ‘brupted' was indicated as ‘brupted in a state where the ability to discern things or make decisions is weak due to a stimulative disorder, tide, editing evidence, etc., and that ‘brupted’ was “A’, and the above suspect interrogation protocol was cut down by hand and damaged by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Correspondence;

1. E statements;

1. Existing suspect interrogation protocol for the accused;

1. A report on internal investigation (an investigation into additional crimes of invalidation, such as public documents);

1. Reports on internal investigation (an investigation of the opposite party for internal investigation of the IF located in Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin), copies of I

1. A copy of the judgment (cases, such as interference with the performance of official duties, etc. by Cheongju District Court 2016 Gohap 162);

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history, reporting of the previous convictions of the disposition, and reporting of the results thereof, and applying a copy of each written judgment.

arrow