Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2020, at the house of the defendant of Dacheon apartment C, the defendant around 22:50 on August 22, 2020, after being requested by the defendant from the wife D who lives in a flat wheeler due to cerebral diseases, to cover the wheeler in the toilet, whether the above D caused her to do so on the last day of her death.

The judgment below held that the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel so that the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs, and the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs, and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs to use the wheel chairs. The Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs to use the wheel chairs, and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs. The Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel so that the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs. The Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel, and the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel, and the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel, and the Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs. The Defendant and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs, and the Defendant were able to use the wheel chairs.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made by the defendant to the defendant in court D or F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the punishment as ordered by the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime.

In unfavorable circumstances, interference with official duties needs to be strictly punished as a crime detrimental to the function of the state by obstructing legitimate exercise of public authority.

Damage of the defendant.