1. The Defendant’s temporary seizure of investment certificates against Daegu District Court resident support 2016Kadan20029 against Taecheon Construction Co., Ltd.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Composition Construction Co., Ltd. filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures with the Daegu District Court on December 7, 2012. On January 9, 2013, 2013, the said court rendered a decision of commencing rehabilitation as Daegu District Court 2012 Gohap74 on January 9, 2013. (2) After the process of self-help efforts and the inflow of outside funds, the constituent construction Co., Ltd. was under good financial standing. Accordingly, on January 1, 2013, upon obtaining permission from the court, paid the acquisition price of investment certificates to the Construction Mutual Aid Association, which is set forth in the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, etc., and the Construction Mutual Aid Association allocated 356 investment certificates to its constituent construction Co., Ltd.

3) On January 17, 2014, the above court rendered a decision to terminate the rehabilitation procedure against the constituent construction company. (B) On February 18, 2014, the Yongsung Development Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with the constituent construction company on the division and merger of civil engineering works, construction works, and landscaping construction business, and succeeded to the rights and obligations of the constituent construction company around that time. The subject of succession was also included 356 shares of the above investment certificate. (C) March 24, 2014; the trade name of the above constituent construction company was changed into the Japanese comprehensive construction company; and the trade name of the above Youngsung Development Co., Ltd. was changed to the composition construction company (However, there is a possibility of confusion due to a change in overlapping with the above trade name; (hereinafter, the name and division of the corporation whose trade name was changed from the constituent construction company to the Japanese comprehensive construction company; and (2) the name and division of the corporation before and after the change from the composition construction company to the "B" company.

B Co., Ltd., the plaintiff of this case, is the plaintiff

(D) The Defendant is a company A under the Wage Claim Guarantee Act between March 2013 and December 2013.