logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.15 2017가단510887
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant shall include 12,812,576 won and each of the above money to plaintiffs E, 19,718,865 won, plaintiffs A, B, C, and D respectively.

Reasons

1. Based on the facts, Plaintiff E is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract aimed at compensating for damages in a case where the spouse, Plaintiff A, B, C, and D of the network H’s spouse died due to a traffic accident that occurred in front of G Hayang-si around December 3, 2016 (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurance company that entered into one ton cargo vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”) with respect to an automobile accident resulting from vehicle operation.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The driverJ of the Maritime Vehicle who is subject to the limitation on the occurrence of liability for damages and the liability of the driver of the Maritime Vehicle enter the intersection, without neglecting the duty of care to pass the intersection safely, while driving the Maritime Vehicle in front of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, driving the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, driving the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, leaving the intersection to the Ambassador village in front of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries at the right-hand. The place was where the driver did not direct traffic as an intersection of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, and the left-hand side of the plaintiff HH driver's vehicle with no traffic signal. Thus, the driver of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Office, while driving the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries at the right-hand side of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries at the right-hand side of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, had the heir of the H driver's vehicle with the upper part of the H driver's vehicle in front of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, resulting in the plaintiff's death from the accident in front of the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Act.

I would like to say.

However, as H driving the otoba, the accident place is an intersection where the traffic of vehicles is frequent.

arrow