1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim for the confirmation of existence of each of the obligations against the Defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2...

1. Statement of basic facts [based on recognition] Gap 1 through 5 (including each number);

가. 2015. 10. 24. 10:10경 서울 성북구 E 앞 교차로를 원고보조참가인 운전의 F 개인택시(이하 가해차량이라 한다)가 동방고개방면에서 광운공고방향으로 편도 2차로 중 1차로에서 신호위반하여 직진한 과실로 진행방향 우측에서 정상신호에 직진하던 제3의 차량과 충돌하고, 그 충격으로 가해차량이 진행방향 반대차로 쪽으로 밀리며 튕겨 가 그곳에서 신호대기 정차 중이던 피고 D 운전의 G 차량(이하 피해차량이라 한다)과 충돌하였다

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

Based on the following: (a) Defendant B, who was boarding the damaged vehicle due to the instant accident, was paid KRW 90,00,00, total amount of KRW 1,246,000, total amount of KRW 346,246,00, total amount of KRW 340,00, total amount of KRW 80,000, KRW 297,080, total amount of KRW 1,097,000, KRW 1,097,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 297,000, KRW 1,097,097,000, and KRW 100,000, and KRW 80, KRW 1000 to H hospital that treated Defendant C, and KRW 108,00,00, KRW 100,00, and KRW 100,00,00 for Defendant D’s medical care center that treated Defendant C.

2. According to the “Madar” program that requested the National Institute of Scientific Investigation to appraise at the Seoul Cancer Police Station upon the request of the driver of the Plaintiff’s alleged Adarcing Vehicle, there has been a reply that the instant accident is insignificant, and thus, it is difficult to view the Defendants as being injured.

Therefore, the Plaintiff does not have any obligation to pay to the Defendants with respect to the instant accident. Therefore, the Plaintiff sought confirmation of the absence of such obligation against the Defendants, and the medical expenses of each mutual-aid that the Plaintiff paid to the Defendants.