The defendant shall be innocent.

On January 2, 2015, around 15:16, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim E (the 19-year-old age), who is a trainee, to send a photograph to a Handphone, within the front city area C, to the victim E (the 19-year-old age-old) who is located in the front city area C, to sit at the chair.

When the Defendant, as the victim and the victim were seated, and sought an explanation on the transmission of Handphone messages from the victim, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim on the ground that the victim’s left buck sub-branch was only three times as the victim’s left buck sub-branch was involved.

Judgment

1. The summary of the defendant's assertion does not constitute an indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act in full view of the fact that the defendant saw the victim's left side by hand three times, or the circumstances leading to the act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act.

2. In a criminal trial of relevant legal principles, the finding of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to a judge to have a conviction that is sufficient to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the doubt of guilt against the defendant would also be doubtful.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do8675 Decided March 9, 2006, etc.). “Indecent act” means an act that causes a sense of sexual humiliation or aversion to the public objectively and contrary to good sexual morality, which infringes on the victim’s sexual freedom. Whether it constitutes such an act ought to be determined carefully by comprehensively taking into account the victim’s intent, gender, age, relationship between the offender and the victim prior to the occurrence of the act, circumstances leading to the act, specific form of act, and the surrounding objective situation and the sexual moral sense of that time.

(see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do5856, Sept. 26, 2013). 3. Whether the Defendant’s act constitutes “indecent act” and whether there was intention, first of all, the Defendant’s act was found to have been committed three times with the victim’s hand floor.