1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are the parties in the middle of the 1990s, in response to the consultation compensation for the removal of their own land and buildings during the process of various urban development projects, such as AI apartment removal projects implemented by the defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City or its affiliated autonomous Gu from the mid-1990s, the plaintiffs are entitled to the special supply apartment in the Songpa-gu AJ District AH district (hereinafter "AH district apartment apartment").

2) Defendant SAB is an agent for an urban development project to be performed by Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and a project implementer for a housing site development project for AH district, under the relevant laws such as the Local Public Enterprises Act, and is a project implementer for an urban development project to be performed by Defendant AH district housing development project.

B. On April 26, 2007, on the newspaper and its website, the Defendant Eps Corporation published a notice that “AH district and AK district special supply schedule guide” (hereinafter “instant notice”) containing the content that the apartment housing of AH district is specially supplied to the project implementer and the AI apartment removalers, etc. on the cultural daily bulletin.

The notice of this case contains the location of AH district, general status of the project, and outline of the time of supply, supply plan, supply method, and detailed schedule.

In addition, at that time, Defendant Ehypt posted “AH district 3, 4 complex special supply notice (Dong/Dong) and “AH district 12, 13 complex lottery table notice” (hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”) under the Defendant’s website, which provides information on the date and time of drawing lots, period of concluding contracts, significant matters, etc. regarding the special supply of apartment in AH district.

The notice of this case and the notice of this case do not stipulate both the sale price and the method of payment.

C. After sending the special supply contract guidance, the Defendant SP Corporation around October 2007.