(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단3255

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단3255

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On May 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment due to habitual fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the previous prison on October 24, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 28, 2018, around 04:00 on September 28, 2018, the Defendant sent the attitude that the victim C working in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as an employee would have paid the food value at the “D” restaurant where C is working as an employee, and ordered the Defendant to do so with a china Kim Jong-b and a luctor.

However, in fact, the defendant did not pay the food value without paying the food value, and there was no intention to pay the food value.

The Defendant was provided with 8,00 won in total by the market price from the injured party, and she was provided with a mistake with a single amb Kim Kim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around 05:00 on September 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the business of the Defendant: (b) was unable to flick the restaurant; (c) was in the instant “D” restaurant; (d) was in the direction of other customers in the next customer with his own / her will; and (d) took a bath to the customers; (d) was able to threaten the customers, and (e) was flicked with a salt; (e) was flicked; and (e) the customer was flicked with the customer; and (e) the customer was flicked with the customer; and (e)

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim C's restaurant business by force.

3. On September 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 05:30, at the front of the instant “D” restaurant, the Defendant: (b) received a demand from an employee E who is a restaurant to pay the food value; (c) performed an act that seems to have taken advantage of his/her hand; and (d) took the action from the Victim F (the age of 49) to remove the victim from his/her son; and (c) was able to boom the victim’s chest, biffing him/her with breath of his/her son, and boomed the victim’s chest, and was able to take the victim’s neck.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and C;

1. A restaurant, CCTV.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단1058

-서울북부지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고단467

-울산지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고단2550

-서울동부지방법원 2017.04.26 2016고단3418

-울산지방법원 2018.03.20 2018고단163