logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.23 2016나61075
보관금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for paragraphs 2-B (b) (8) and 9, which are subsequent to the judgment of the court of first instance, and adding the following to paragraphs (1) and (9). Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance

B. In addition, the part of each of the instant claims 8: (a) although the Plaintiff stated the agreement to establish a mortgage, which is a disposal document, as a creditor-mortgage with respect to C, according to the circumstances acknowledged earlier, it seems clear and acceptable to deem the loan of this case not to be the loan of this case; (b) there is a clear and acceptable counter-proof evidence to deem the loan of this case not to be the loan of this case; and (c) even if the written statement with the resident number stated at the bottom of the evidence No. 4

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow