logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.04.28 2015고단3588
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 21, 2015 to February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) employed the Defendant’s “D Magazine” operated by the Defendant, which was in Bupyeong City C and IV from around the same month; (b) caused E to engage in a similarity act that helps an unspecified number of male customers who had found the said business in his/her hand to see the sexual organ of the unspecified number of male customers; and (c) received 100,000 won from the said male customers to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Part of the protocol (list 8) concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the accused;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the relevant criminal facts, Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of elective Commercial Sex Acts, and the defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding the punishment of imprisonment

1. The defendant alleged that he merely ordered an employee, such as E, to engage in the act of similarity as stated in the facts charged, against a customer who receives a marina log of at least 100,000 won, and he did not know that E did such similarity act.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined in this court, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant, explicitly or implicitly, had an employee of the relevant marina shop suggest the act of similarity to the customer and, if the customer complies with it, had the employee perform the act of similarity and acquire the price separately from the employee.

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.

Witness

According to F's testimony, recognition is made of illegal similaritys referred to as Hdos, services, etc., which are employees of the said establishment, provided that they are:

arrow