logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 02. 26. 선고 2014두44601 판결
(심리불속행) 구주택 양도계약서를 허위 이중계약서로 볼 수 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2014-Nu-50820 ( October 23, 2014)

Title

(Republic Trial Disorder) The old house transfer contract can be seen as a false double contract.

Summary

(The gist of the original trial) Preparation and submission of a false double contract which states the sale price understating in order to grant credibility to the false declaration price and conceal the actual transaction price constitutes a fraudulent or other unlawful act as an active deception.

Related statutes

Article 26-2 of Framework Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

February 26, 2015

arrow