logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2021.02.09 2020고단165
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 70,00,00 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Youngju District Court on March 30, 207, when driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.106% from blood on March 9, 2007. On December 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement) at the same court on March 31, 2011 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement) by a fine of KRW 0.109% on July 28, 2016 (refluence of alcohol level of the blood alcohol level) by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.109% on April 10, 2016.

On August 14, 2020, the Defendant, at around 21:31, run D Daelim TTT 49c motor bicycle under the influence of alcohol 0.171% while under the influence of alcohol, without obtaining a motor device bicycle license from the parking lot from around 20 meters to the C front Road.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a motor bicycle without obtaining a motor device bicycle license in violation of Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act and violated Article 44 (1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act at the same time.

2. On August 14, 2020, the Defendant, at around 22:00, tried to leave the scene despite receiving a demand for a measurement of drinking from a slope F belonging to the E District in the Young-dong Police Station E District of the Young-dong Police Station called out after receiving a report on driving under the influence of alcohol in front of C at around 14, 2020, and tried to leave the site, and was subject to F’s control.

E. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties in relation to police officers' investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement 1. F with respect to F.

arrow