logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.07.05 2018고정326
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was revised.

Where an owner of a motor vehicle intends to conduct the tubes by altering part of the structure and devices of a motor vehicle or adding affixed objects to a motor vehicle, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu, and no person shall operate a motor vehicle with the knowledge that the motor vehicle has been installed without obtaining approval.

1. On February 2, 2017 to March 2, 2017, the Defendant, who installed without permission, left the Defendant’s apartment complex No. 2203 at the apartment complex No. 2, 711 Dong 2203, without obtaining approval from the competent authority, left the driver’s seat and the chief seat of the Defendant’s vehicle No. CNS C, which was owned by the Defendant, and installed the BV market arbitrarily on the Internet.

2. On April 2017, the Defendant installed a noise prevention device without permission: (a) at the Pining shop where it is difficult to ascertain the trade name where the scoo is located at an ancient time between around to June 2017; (b) without obtaining approval from the competent authority, the Defendant removed the existing noise prevention device for the NAS PP car without obtaining approval from the competent authority; and (c) installed a noise prevention device separately purchased.

3. On October 25, 2017, the Defendant, who operated a motor vehicle without permission, was aware that the motor vehicle, as described in the Class 1 and paragraph 2, was installed on the road before the duty-free shop of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in front of the duty-free shop of the 149 East Asia, and that it was a motor vehicle installed without approval.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Photographs of the vehicle taken at the time of crackdown, and photograph of the skin vehicle;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of inquiries about details of structural changes of the suspected vehicle;

1. Article 81 Subparag. 19 of the relevant Act and Article 34 Subparag. 1 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act concerning criminal facts; Articles 81 and 34 Subparag. 20 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (which has not been approved) and Articles 81 Subparag. 20 and 34 Subparag. 1 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (which have not been approved).

arrow