The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months: Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from “C” main points located in Ansan-si, and received a 112 report; and (b) received a request from E and returned home from a policeman belonging to D District of the Police Station D police station; (c) the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, committed assault, such as spiting, spit, ebling, ebbing, and ebbbing, e in the outside part of E, and embling the money on the outside part of E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the scope of sentencing guidelines] - Type 1 (Interference with and Forced Performance of Duties) in the basic area (from June to April) - No person subject to special sentencing: No sentence [decision] - The defendant has a record of being punished for suspension of execution by interfering with the performance of official duties in 2006 - The defendant has a record of being punished for suspension of execution due to a violation of the performance of official duties in 206 - favorable circumstances: the defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant.