logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고단2302
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million on November 25, 2013 to a fine of KRW 5 million on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts), and on November 26, 2014, by the Busan District Court, to a fine of KRW 5 million on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (mediation, etc.

Defendant

B On December 13, 2002, the Changwon District Court issued a summary order of KRW 50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Customs Business Regulation Act; on September 13, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Medical Service Act; on April 15, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging of Commercial Sex Acts (e.g., brokerage of commercial sex acts); and on October 6, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic), the Defendant is a person who operates buildings E in Kimhae-si, and Fmaz.

The Defendant, from March 10, 2017 to March 21, 2017, employed female employees from the above marina shop, received KRW 80,00 from many unspecified men, and in return, assisted female employees to scam and scam the sexual organs of the male, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

(b) No person in violation of the Educational Environment Protection Act shall operate a business that provides services that may cause physical contacts between unspecified persons, sexual exposure to a sealed part, etc. or cause similar acts in an educational environment protection zone to protect the health, sanitation, safety, learning, and educational environment of students;

Nevertheless, the defendant, as described in the above paragraph (a), was engaged in the brokerage of sexual traffic in the educational environment protection zone.

2. A person who is a defendant B.

arrow