beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Seized evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 Height794: Defendant A]
1. On May 14, 2015, Defendant A was combined with Defendant B, and the written indictment of Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, and 108 Dong Dong around 16:40 from May 14, 2015 to 17:50 from May 14, 2015, stated “304 Dong” as “304 Dong,” but it appears to be an obvious clerical error in “108 Dong.”
In the case of the victim E in 502, the defendant A reported the network before the elevator, and the defendant B added the locking device to the locking device by inserting the locking device between the front door of the entrance where the rejection in possession was corrected (tentatively referred to as the "fluor"), and then stolen the locking device. The defendant A entered the inside the house of the defendant B and the victim, and entered the two of the victim and the husband in the house of the victim, and then stolen the locking device with a precious metal in the market price, such as one, 24K gold paper, 1, 24K gold paper, 24K gold paper, 24K gold paper, 5 K gold paper.
2. Larceny, damage to property, intrusion upon residence, or attempted intrusion on May 20, 2015;
A. At around 14:50 on May 20, 2015, Defendant A put a rejection prepared in advance between the locking device and the locking device of the entrance, which was corrected at the time of the gathering of the victim H, located in Manyang-gu G 103 Dong 1301, Manyang-gu, Manyang-si, G 103 Do, and 1301, and damaged the locking door to the victim’s ownership so that 4.50,000 won can come at the repair cost. However, Defendant A failed to intrude the victim’s residence on the wind of the damaged sucking door and attempted to do so.
B. Defendant A, at around 15:00 on the same day, was in the house of the Victim J, who was located in Mayang-gu I, 106 dong 801, and 15:00.
In the same way, 4.10,00 won of repair expenses were damaged by the 4.1 billion won, but it was difficult to intrude the residence through the gate because of the hot water that had been placed in front of the gate, and the intention was not achieved and attempted.
C. Defendant A, around 15:10 on the same day, was at the victim K’s house located in the said I apartment 106 dong 802.
In the same manner as this paragraph, 250,000 won is the repair cost.