logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단4666
특수재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the victim H (the 30 years of age) met with a workplace club fee, and from around 2015 to around 2015, the Defendant her franced with a franc with another female on the ground that there is frequent dispute after marriage with another female on November 2015. On November 18, 2015, the Defendant damaged the property by putting about KRW 1,00,000 of the market price of the victim’s franc with a 6 phone carrying device on the floor of the victim’s cell room at around 22:00, 2015. The Defendant destroyed the property by making it possible for the victim to contact with another male on November 18, 2015.

2. Around July 26, 2016, the Defendant damaged a special property by an office knife, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that he/she did not want to do so at the office located on the 12th floor of the J building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and on the ground that he/she did not want to do so to himself/herself, the Defendant destroyed it well with a bags, Maspboard, and a portable telephone charging line equivalent to KRW 207,00 in total market value of the victim’s possession.

3. On August 3, 2016, from around 09:00 to around 18:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim a year from the date of the foregoing paragraph (2) to the above “K; (b) prevented the victim from entering the first office; (c) called the victim who is suffering from the victim, from the victim, from entering the office; and (d) sent a set of several hundreds of the victim’s day to the victim’s meeting to call conversations or to the victim’s meeting for business purposes; and (e) in advance, the victim was on his/her responsibility

L and other business-related documents interfered with the victim's business by force, such as placing them in the clothes of other employees.

4. The Defendant, such as the electronic records of the company, and the electronic records, has expressed his mind to “M” that the victim thought to be his/her own workplace in order to continuously return the victim’s mind, without the victim’s consent. On August 22, 2016, the Defendant, using his/her office computer located in “K,” prepared and stored a statement of the victim’s job application, self-introduction, and a list of research activities in the relevant field using the victim’s name.

arrow