A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:00 on June 24, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business. Around 23:00, at the main point of “C” located in Sanyang-gu Mayang-gu Mayang-si, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as punishing for a disturbance during drinking together with the drinking. Accordingly, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business of the said main shop employees by force for approximately 40 minutes, such as: (a) the customers, who were on other table, were in drinking; (b) the customers, who were in drinking together with the drinking.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), she saw the circumstances of the instant case by police officers, such as Anyangan Police Station EdistrictF, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 regarding the above obstruction of performance of official duties, and she saw the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business, and she saw the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business, “a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

As a result, the Defendant interfered with F’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Investigation report (CCTV investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV extraction photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommended sentences according to sentencing guidelines] - Interference with business shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the basic area of six months.