1. Plaintiffs JW, JX, LA, MC, MC, MU, MV, NJ, PG, PL, PM, P Q, QN, QN, TK, and UY other Plaintiffs Co., Ltd.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "Defendant E" among the reasons for the judgment of the first instance are as "E"; "Defendant E corporation (hereinafter "Defendant E") is as "E corporation" (hereinafter "E")"; "C was ordered to commence rehabilitation proceedings on April 10, 2015 with Seoul Central District Court 201 Ma46, and on December 24, 2014, the following part of the judgment was transferred to the administrator of the first instance court 11, 16, 17, and 11, and "C was changed to the administrator of the second instance court 3, 2017, 300, 17, 3000, 3000, 3000, 300,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000).

2. The changed part

(a) Article 2-2 (b) among the grounds for the judgment of the first instance;

B. 1) Attached Table 2-1-1, 4-1-1, and 5-1-1 list of the plaintiffs as to the above plaintiffs are the plaintiffs as to the claim for return of unjust enrichment due to the cancellation of each of the sales contracts in this case to the defendant A or the defendant B, who is the executor company, and are only the plaintiffs as to the restitution based on the cancellation or cancellation (attached Form 2-1-