logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 11. 17. 선고 2012두3491 판결
이 사건 성과급의 손금 인정여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-201-Nu-2208 ( October 11, 2012)

Title

Whether to recognize the deductible expenses of the performance rate of this case

Summary

In light of the fact that piece rates paid according to the instant employment contract, etc. do not seem to be bonuses by the disposal of profits, the lower court’s determination that the amount to be compensated in this case should be included in deductible expenses because it was against the Labor Cost stipulated in Article 19 subparag. 3 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act is justifiable, and [Contents of the

Related statutes

Article 19 of the Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2012du3491 Revocation of revocation of request for rectification

Plaintiff

○○○○ Corporation

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

on October 000 00

Imposition of Judgment

November 17, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Article 19(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act (amended by Act No. 9267, Dec. 26, 2008; hereinafter the same) provides that deductible expenses shall be the amount of losses incurred from transactions which reduce the net assets of the relevant corporation, excluding refund of capital or financing, and disposal of surplus funds, and Article 19 subparag. 3 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 21302, Feb. 4, 2009; hereinafter the same) provides that the amount of deductible expenses paid by the relevant corporation pursuant to Article 19 subparag. 3 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act shall be one of the deductible expenses under Article 19(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 9267, Dec. 1, 208; hereinafter the same shall apply) to which the Plaintiff’s employees and employees would be entitled to compensate for the difference between the amount of deductible expenses paid to the relevant corporation and its employees.

arrow