logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.12.18 2011가합16092
분양대금반환 등
Text

1. All of the lawsuits filed by the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs (Counterclaim defendants) against defendant K corporation are dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1 between the parties is as follows: the Defendant Association is an apartment NE on the ground (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) on the land outside of 90 lots in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu M.

(2) On January 25, 2008, the sales contract was concluded between the defendant union and the defendant union to sell the apartment of this case at 685 million won. On July 18, 2008, the plaintiff H (O) entered into a sales contract between the defendant union and the defendant union to sell the apartment of this case at 105,201,00 won. On July 18, 2008, the defendant union entered the sales contract between the defendant union and the defendant union to sell the apartment of this case at 68,93 million won. The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs entered the above plaintiffs into the sales contract between the defendant union and the defendant union to purchase the apartment of this case at 108,50,000 won in the unit price of the apartment of this case at 68,930,000 won in unit price of the apartment of this case.

(2) Each of the sales contracts of this case shall be concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant's association for the apartment of this case, and each of the sales contracts of this case shall be "the intermediate payment of this case" as the part of each of the sales contracts of this case. The plaintiffs entered into a balcony expansion contract of this case with the defendant K for each of the apartment of this case, and the plaintiffs entered into a balcony expansion contract of this case with the defendant K for each of the sales contracts of this case as the down payment of each of the above construction contracts of this case, and the down payment of each of the sales contracts of this case is identical to the amount indicated in the "contract deposit" of each of the sales contracts of this case as the down payment of each of the sales contracts of this case.

arrow