logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2017.10.31 2017가단667
배당이의
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 21, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for a compulsory auction for each real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by G with the Suwon District Court Decision 2015Kahap6954, the title of execution for a ruling of recommending reconciliation with executory power as to G, and on June 22, 2016, the procedure for compulsory auction for real estate (hereinafter “instant compulsory auction procedure”).

B. G: (1) On July 8, 2016, G issued a promissory note with a face value of KRW 80,000,000 at sight; (2) on the same day, if the payment of the said note is delayed, G drafted a notarial deed (No. 435, 2016, a notary public) recognizing the compulsory execution; (3) on July 11, 2016, 200 KRW 145,000,000 and KRW 206,000 as a notarial deed with a face value of KRW 50,000,000,000 as a notarial deed with a face value of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 as a notarial deed with a face value of KRW 16,50,000,000,000 as a notarial deed with a face value of KRW 26,016,000,000,000.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “each notarial deed of this case”).

Based on the original copy of each of the notarial deeds in this case, Plaintiff D on July 21, 2016.

arrow