All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment (one-year imprisonment) of the judgment of the court below against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.

2. Determination as follows: (a) agreement is made with the victim of larceny; (b) there is no record of the crime exceeding a fine; (c) there is no agreement with the victim of special bodily injury, special property damage and assault; and (d) there is no agreement with the victim of special bodily injury, special property damage and assault; and (e) there is no risk that the form of crime is dangerous enough to lead to large accidents.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, sex, career, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading up to the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of the change, the lower court’s judgment’s punishment is deemed appropriate. Therefore, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.