The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (one year of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is unreasonable because it is too unfasible.

2. The judgment is based on the following reasons: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of a crime; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for bodily injury or damage to property in 2006; and (c) the Defendant did not have the same criminal records; (d) the Defendant used violence against a police officer who weared a uniform; and (e) the police officer who was dispatched upon receipt of a report in 112, was able to sprink the breath of the police officer’s breath, and walk the breath of the arms and the breath of the breath, and the degree of

The Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, on the ground that the lower court’s punishment is reasonable, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, career, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading up to the commission of an offense; (b) circumstances after the commission of an offense; and (c) other matters regarding the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments on changes

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.