The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the special injury of the summary of the grounds for appeal, where Q, etc., including A, conflict with G

There is consistently stated that W and H have consistently made a statement, and I did not make any particular objection against the attack in the process of inducing W and H. I.

G repairer X has a trace of collision with other vessels by G.

The judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although the defendant's operation of I and the conflict between G.

2. Determination

A. On January 16, 2016, at around 07:36, the Defendant entered the instant facts charged, at around 07:36, Cheongjin-gun, the Defendant: (a) went into the port of 2, Cheongjin-gun with three seafarers; (b) went into the port of 82, 10:00, and went into the port of 82,00 (36-09N 129-54E, 30, 300,000,000,000; (c) but, on January 17, 2016, the catch was low and went into the port of east-gun, the livestock industry at around 9:0,000, which was administered to the sea; and (d) when the Defendant was in violation of the standards of red water at the time of the control of the captain’s dispatch of the livestock vessel to the port of east-gun at around 17, 2016.

G The captain of G is erroneous as having reported, and around 08:00 on the same day, approximately 13 Ma on the same side of the livestock industry.

The part of the victim Q Qu(57), S(45) and T(50) on G deck, which is a dangerous object by operating G I in the course of operating G in the direction of G, suffered from the victim Qu(57), who was on board the G, in excess of G deck, and caused the victim Q Q Q Q in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, under the left side, for about two weeks of treatment, under the left side, for the arms, for the straw, for the straw, and for the tension and for about two weeks of treatment to the victim S, and for the victim T, the victim C suffered from the injury that requires medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment.

B. The lower court’s judgment determined that A’s statement Q. Q.