logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단4288
사기
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 26, 2011, the Defendant was released on September 28, 2012 and completed the parole period on November 24, 2012, when he/she was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the District Court, and was released on September 28, 2012 in a governmental prison.

[2016 Highest 4288]

1. The Defendant against the victim C calls the victim C to the victim C at the Hari Institute located in the Victim C and Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and around March 6, 2013, the Defendant was serving in the modern Asan City.

It is possible to purchase modern merchandise coupons in street blurging for employees, so it is possible to get a lot of profit from selling these merchandise coupons.

If payments are made, 90% of the profits will be made.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, since there was no modern merchandise coupon from the defendant's Dongsan in the modern world, and there was a situation in which the defendant borrowed money from many people for the purchase of merchandise coupons in the past but failed to pay money, it was thought that he will be used to pay his debt even after receiving money from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim C, received KRW 4,90,000 from the new bank account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the purchase of merchandise coupons from the victim, from that time, and received KRW 97,978,200 in total by the same method over 31 times from September 21, 2015, such as the list of crimes in the annexed crime list, from September 21, 2015.

2. The Defendant, against the victim D through the victim C, was aware of the victim D through the victim C, and the Defendant, on June 11, 2013, purchased gift certificates, such as by phone to C, in the name of Dong birth, which is an employee of modern Asan, and offered profits of high amount by purchasing gift certificates, such as the preceding paragraph, to C.

After making a false statement, they had the victim D remit money in their job.

The Defendant is the victim D.

arrow