(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.15 2019고단691

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.15 2019고단691

특수절도등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2019, the Defendant cut off, around 05:35, 2019, the cash amount of one million won owned by the victim C, who intruded into the said store by cutting the lock door up at the seat of the victim C in the first floor of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B building, and was in custody at the safe located there, by destroying the fastening chain of the lock door.

"2019 Highest 1650"

1. On November 18, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) opened a chief door that was parked in the “E” parking lot prior to the phrase “E” store located in Ansan-si; (b) did not discover the money and valuables to be stolen by entering the front door owned by the victim F. G. G. which was parked therein; (c) but did not commit an attempted crime, with the wind that does not discover the money and valuables.

2. At night, around 00:00 on November 19, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny at night buildings, and attempted to open a gate in a way that was operated by the victim H, with the door door opened by the victim H, and to color money and other valuables to be stolen by rupture into the rupture and to open a rupture on the rupture, but failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 691"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation reports (to visit the site of the case and to investigate the other party of the victim), investigation reports (to attach details of sales status submitted by the victim C);

1. The CCTV data Defendant and the defense counsel had access to an electronic tobacco store as stated in the facts constituting a crime in this part, but they were not entered as a thief but as a thief’s criminal intent.

However, the victim's statement and the sales supporting the victim's statement and the defendant's intrusion on the electronic tobacco store.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 남원지원 2013.07.23 2013고단108

-대구지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고단5166

-대전지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단935 (1)

-대전지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고단935

-서울남부지방법원 2017.12.19 2017고단4623