1. The Defendant’s decision on disability ratings rendered to the Plaintiff on August 21, 2013 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In around 1999, the Plaintiff received a decision of grade 6 disability rating from the Defendant and completed the first registration of a disabled person on the ground of “balone’s body,” and received a decision of adjusting the degree of disability from the Defendant to Grade 2 on the ground of “cerebral disease,” around 2001.

In around 2002, the Plaintiff was determined by the Defendant to maintain the degree of disability as class 2 on the ground of “cerebral disease.”

B. On May 23, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for the determination of disability rating to the Defendant.

On August 21, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the disability grade 4 of the Plaintiff on August 21, 2013 (hereinafter “the disability grade of the Plaintiff”) with the result of the National Pension Service’s examination that “the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under class 4,” in light of the Plaintiff’s 4 degree of disability, i.e., e., e., cutting off and unloading the clothes of the Plaintiff’s walk, her arms, and her arms with the other’s aid.”

C. On October 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant regarding the instant disability grade disposition.

The Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on November 27, 2013, based on the results of the National Pension Service’s examination that “the Plaintiff’s degree of disability falls under class 4, considering that the Plaintiff’s degree of disability falls under class 3 and class 4 of the right bridge, the left side falls under class 5, and the Plaintiff’s degree of disability falls under class 4.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, 3, and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disability grade disposition is legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion is in the state of the right side of cerebrovascular, experienced in 2000, and thus, it is difficult for the plaintiff to get off clothes with his clothes, and provide meals and bathing without the help of another person. Thus, it is difficult for the plaintiff to walk.