beta
Text
Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged shall not lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising the consideration, and shall not lend any access medium with the knowledge that it will be used for a crime or used for a crime;
The Defendant, through the Defendant-friendly B, accepted the proposal that “The Defendant would lend the physical card connected to the Defendant’s account to an influencer, and transfer the money connected to the Defendant’s account to the account under the name of the influencer’s company to the account in the name of the influencer’s name.”
At the time, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was a person who operated an illegal sports earth site.
On September 2016, the Defendant was paid KRW 10,00 in cash for the following reasons: (a) on September 1, 2016, the Defendant sent three-party cash cards to the national bank account (Account Number C), one bank account (Account Number D), and the new bank account (Account Number E) under the name of the Defendant’s name in Ansan-ro, Seosan-ro 6-7, Ansan-ro, Ansan-ro, Ansan-ro, Seosan-ro, Seosan-ro, Seosan-ro, Seosan-ro, Seosan-ro, an elementary school
Accordingly, the defendant was aware that he will be used for crime, and lent cash cards, which are access media, while receiving or promising compensation.
2. According to the records of this case, the defendant received a summary order (1271 highest 2017 highest 2017 highest 1271) on February 27, 2017 and confirmed on March 25, 2017 as criminal facts of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act that the defendant transferred the e-mail card linked to the national bank account under the name of the defendant to F around September 2016, and the e-mail card linked to the new bank account (Account Number C), the e-mail account (Account Number C), one bank account (Account Number D), and the new bank account (Account Number E). The time charged is also related to the total 3 cash card connected to the same day.
In the case of a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.