Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

(b) Crime history;

1. On July 14, 2016, at least 06:00 on July 14, 2016, the Defendant expressed the attitude that the Defendant was able to keep the Victim D (A, 29 years of age) under the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building*****, the victim returned home late, and he was blick with the victim's blick, and the victim blick with the blick and defective blick, which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen, brought about 27 cm in total length and 16 cm in length on the day) and blick with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a dangerous kitchen, which is a kitchen.

2. On July 14, 2016, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 10:10 on July 14, 2016, the injured defendant, even though the victim wants to save, and even when the defendant alone wants to sacrife by drinking alcohol, he was found to have a defect that the victim would have reported sacrife the defendant's sacrife on the floor of hand with "defing" and sacrife the defendant's sacrife on the floor. However, the injured defendant sacrifeed two parts on the part of the victim's cell phone after her knifeing the victim's kick and walking the knife of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (Attachment A, such as knife knife against the victim by suspect A);

1. Application of each statute on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of special intimidation in this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order is that the defendant threatened the victim with the kitchen knife, and the method of crime was very dangerous, and the degree of assault against the victim in the crime of injury in this case