A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the legal marital relationship between the victim B (math, 38 years of age) and the married couple in 2003.

1. Around 04:40 on August 7, 2018, the injured Defendant drinking alcohol within the main point operated by the victim in Mangsan-dong, U.S., and received from the victim the CCTV inside the main point of view or the nasium data of the victim’s vehicle, and caused injury to the victim, such as the victim’s internal CCTV, and the victim’s nasium, and the victim’s nasium lapsing the victim’s nasium, leading the victim to the toilet, leading the victim to the toilet, leading the victim’s venasium, moving the victim’s vesium, moving the victim’s vesium, walking the victim’s bridge, walking the victim’s bridge, leading the victim to approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, threatened the victim by taking the brush, which is a dangerous object in the bank, in which he would not be released, and showing the victim’s attitude that the victim would inflict any harm on the victim, such as brushing the brush and bruing the brush, and bruing the brush.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A witness's self-written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning death diagnosis, field photographing photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment), Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence) is that the defendant injured the victim and threatened him with dangerous things, and the crime is not likely to be committed in light of the method of crime, etc.

The defendant has a record of criminal punishment several times in relation to the exercise of violence, and in particular, it is based on the dispute with the victim of the crime of this case.