The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On January 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the D convenience store where the victim C (V) was in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu around 21:55 and the Defendant would use a general telephone call for the convenience store to the Defendant.

The victim had purchased goods within the convenience store on the ground that the victim refused to do so.

During compliance with the majority of the victims, “whether the victims have received education at the Egyna City, Crop, Ear, Egymar House;

In addition, the father's chief and Ra, Doer, is not known here, and the victim was openly insulting.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the statement of withdrawal of complaint, it is recognized that the victim revoked the complaint against the defendant on March 21, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.