logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.28 2013고단8196
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 09:20 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the first floor parking lot of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) at the victim C’s parking lot, the Defendant: (c) destroyed the glass door after the victim C’s parking with bricks; and (d) stolen KRW 11,790 on the back seat, which was located within the victim’s ownership (200,000 won at the market price); and (c) on the back seat.

2. Damage to property;

A. At the time and place of Paragraph 1, the Defendant destroyed the victim C’s 946,00 glass, line glass, etc. to cover the repair cost of KRW 946,00,00.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, removed and destroyed a cable connected to a camera by leaving the CCTV camera, a victim E-owner installed in the parking lot, by leaving the e-mail to clarify one’s crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime: Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The heads of both types of punishment under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation;

1. The recommended sentencing criteria for larceny: The range of recommending punishment that no person shall be punished by imprisonment for the larceny of general property: six months to one year and six months (basic area): Whether the person is sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the sentence: The comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the reasons for the suspension of the execution of the sentence - No recovery of damage: No recovery of damage from general pride - no sentencing guidelines has been set for the crime of causing damage to property: there is no criminal conviction above the suspension of the execution of the sentence - the minimum limit of the sentence shall be based on the lowest limit of the sentencing criteria for the larceny; and

2. The interview and interview of the additional actions and the degree of social danger.

arrow