(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.07 2016가단207903

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.07 2016가단207903

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4,523,707 to Plaintiff A, as well as KRW 5% per annum from November 9, 2015 to June 7, 2017, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A is the mother of the plaintiff B.

The defendant is the mother of D.

Plaintiff

B married with D and left E under the chain.

B. 1) The Defendant filed a complaint on the Plaintiff B with the following purport: “The Defendant filed a complaint with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant complaint”) with the Defendant: “The Defendant filed a complaint with the Defendant on January 2015, 2015 with the effect that “A Suspect (Plaintiff B) flicks several parts of the Victim (E) with his/her fingers, blicks, flicks, blicks into the victim’s fingers, and blicks into the victim’s fingers on March 2015, and blicks into the victim’s minor under 13 years of age who had kinship on two occasions.”

(2) On October 27, 2015, the public prosecutor of the Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office: (a) although it is recognized that the victim (E) caused salt in the negative part of the victim (E) and the suspect (Plaintiff B) laid away the side of the victim, it is difficult to readily conclude that the suspect placed the victim’s finger in the victim’s quality only by the victim’s statement; (b) the suspect appears to have laid the victim’s negative part of the victim’s sound part in the course of washing the urine into the place of cremation, and it is difficult to deem that the victim’s negative part was cut for the purpose of committing indecent act; and (c) other evidence alone lack to acknowledge the crime of avoidance; and there is no clear evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

3) A prosecutor’s appeal against the foregoing non-prosecution decision was dismissed on January 19, 2016, and the application for adjudication was dismissed on November 8, 2016, and became final and conclusive around that time. (c) The Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff B and brought up his/her grandchildren E as above; (d) around November 9, 2015, at the Defendant’s office located in Songpa-gu Seoul F and 203 around 07:30 on November 9, 2015, while he/she sought to go back and go back with the Plaintiff, he/she went back to go back with the Plaintiff, and caused the Plaintiff to go up with the Plaintiff’s hand, and caused the Plaintiff to go up with the end of a detailed frame that is not known for treatment for about 70 days.

(hereinafter “instant act”).

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.01.14 2014고합86

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.05.10 2018고합38

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.09.28 2015고합42

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.29 2015고합66

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.01 2016고합57