logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.06.17 2014고정288
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had been allowed from around 200 to October 9, 2008 to open only one cell phone in B’s name from the SK Telecom and from the KTF to the legal spouse from around 2000 to October 9, 2008, but was willing to open only six cell phoness in the name of B.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On May 6, 2008, the Defendant entered “B” in the name column, “F” in the name column, “G” in the resident registration number column, “B” in the applicant column, and “B” in the applicant column, and signed “B” in the name column of the applicant. On May 6, 2008, the Defendant entered “B” in the name column, “B” in the other applicant column, “B” in the resident registration number column, “I” in the address column, “B” in the applicant column, and “B” in the applicant’s name.

B. On May 7, 2008, the Defendant entered “B” in the name column, “B” in the name column, “B” in the resident registration number column, “B” in the column for receipt of the claim, and “B” in the column for applicant column, and signed “B” in the name side of the applicant’s name after entering in the name column for the other contract, “B”, “B” in the resident registration number column, “B” in the customer classification column, “B” in the customer classification column, “B” in the written request address column, and “B” in the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged two copies of the application in the name of private document B and two copies of the contract.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the above 1-A, issued two forged applications as described in the above 1-A to a named agent employee who was aware of the forgery and exercised each of them as if they were duly formed.

B. The Defendant is forged at the same time and place as the above 1-B.

arrow