Defendant

A 12,00,000 won, Defendant B 6,000,000 won, Defendant C and G are punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On November 21, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the suspension of the execution to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. on November 29, 2012, which became final and conclusive on November 29, 2012

1. Defendant A and Defendant F committed an offense: (a) even though they did not have concluded a real estate lease contract with the intent to repay their own bonds, they forged the real estate lease contract as if there was a key money for lease on a deposit basis; (b) provided the said contract as security to the lending company; and (c) Defendant F conspired to receive the loan by acquiring the loan by using the act of carrying out the property as the owner of the building.

On May 31, 2011, Defendant A forged private documents stated “Songbuk-gu H(201)” and “Songbuk-gu H(201)” and “Songbuk-gu I, J, and K in the name column of lessor’s address and resident registration number” in the column of lease contract from Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and affixed the seal of K’s arbitrarily affixed thereto.

As a result, Defendant A forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of K, which is a private document on rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising.

B. On October 5, 201, Defendant A exercised the aforementioned forged contract by delivering the said contract as if it was actually prepared to obtain a security loan for lease on a deposit basis at the coffee store located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of receiving a security loan for lease on a deposit basis.

C. The fraud means that Defendant A exercises the above forged contract as above to the victim L, and Defendant F made a false statement that Defendant A would repay the loan without the mold because Defendant A was able to live in the entire lease deposit amount of KRW 60 million, while taking the action of the building owner by obtaining the confirmation telephone of the victim L.

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have the intention or ability to repay the loans.

Defendants conspired to borrow 9,00,000 won from L with loans from the victim L on July 1, 201, and 15,000,000 won around October 5, 201, and acquired 24,00,000 won by fraud.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant.