beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, as to the Defendants for one year from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who is engaged in driving a D rocketing or other car, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a freezing and freezing vehicle.
1. The Defendant, around 07:00 on January 22, 2016, driven the said rocketing car, and led Defendant A to drive the said rocketing car in the direction of e.g., the shooting distance from the e., the e., the instant e.g., the e., the e., the instant e., the instant e.
At the time, it was difficult to keep the surrounding area and there is a crosswalk, so there was a duty of care to safely check whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a way to see well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, by negligence, the Defendant neglected this and went on, violated the above private-distance intersection by making the victim F (the age of 81) who dried up the crosswalk from the left side of the Defendant’s way to the right side of the Defendant’s way, and used it on the road, and immediately thereafter, led the victim to death due to serious brain injury, etc. on the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant.
(2) On the date and time indicated in paragraph (1) and following the two-lanes of the place, the Defendant was driving the said sealed and freezing vehicles on the part of Defendant B with the same direction as the said car, to the extent that there is no concern about the Defendant’s actual disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’s right of defense.
At the time, it was difficult to see the surrounding area, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a motor vehicle with the driver's duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and driving the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as described in paragraph (1) by negligence.