logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.10.27 2016나43787
사해행위취소
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that runs the business of collecting, transporting, intermediate, and final disposal of industrial wastes, and H was the owner of the instant land prior to the instant donation agreement. The Defendants are the grandchildren of H.

B. The plaintiff's claim 1) against H on December 17, 2007 1: Ulsan District Court 2007Ra7658, "the plaintiff acquired authorization or permission necessary for the above business from H on March 20, 195 to operate the waste disposal business in the land of this case, which was owned by H, from H on December 17, 200 ; however, on the contrary to neighboring residents, H was able to revise the above waste disposal business plan as a housing facility project. On September 23, 2004 and March 25, 2005, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim 30% of the total amount of the land of this case from the 196th of the above land to the 19th of the above 19th of the above 20th of the above 20th of the 19th of the above 20th of the above 3th of the above 20th of the above 20th of the above 3th of the above 20th of the above land.

arrow