The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the driver of the Grand Britain vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to DYF vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. Around April 12, 2018, the Plaintiff driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and was straighted from the 390 teachers’ post distance to the fluoral distance from the 390 teachers’ post distance to the fluoral distance from the fluoral distance to the fluoral distance from the fluoral distance to the fluoral distance from the fluoral distance to the fluor’s post, the Defendant’s vehicle, who was making the left-hand left-hand left-hand from the fluor’s post at the fluoral distance from the fluoral distance to the fluor’s right-hander, the front

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant's vehicle, while the defendant's vehicle had already entered the intersection and had been proceeding considerably, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's negligence in the accident of this case led to 40% of the plaintiff's negligence in the accident of this case, since the plaintiff's vehicle continued to proceed continuously while entering the intersection without discovering and accelerating the defendant's vehicle.

B. The following circumstances recognized by the above facts and the evidence mentioned above, i.e., vehicles that turn to the left at the section where the left-hand turn is permitted shall turn to the left at the right-hand turn in a manner that does not interfere with the passage of the straight-on vehicle while paying attention to the vehicle in the opposite direction. ② Nevertheless, the defendant vehicle seems to have attempted to turn to the left-hand turn at the intersection without properly verifying whether there is a straight-on vehicle, and ③ the plaintiff vehicle is the plaintiff vehicle.