logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.05 2016고단113
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-speed car.

On December 13, 2015, the Defendant, around 20:40 on December 13, 2015, driven the front road of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western-gu, Seoul at a speed of one lane between the two-lanes in the direction of red, underground streets and the two-lanes in the direction of the two-lanes per annum.

At all times, the center line has been installed, and at night, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to protect the vehicle line and drive the motor vehicle safely without breaking the center line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front part of the victim E(19 cc) driving, which was normally driven by the opposite opposite vehicle line, due to the negligence of breaking the center line and driving the opposite vehicle, and got the front part of the victim E(19 cc) driving, 650cc U. S. c., which was driving the opposite vehicle, into the front part of the Defendant’s car, to move the front part of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, injury to the victim E, such as an open wound of a bridge, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (V, 18 years of age) who was on the back of the above Oral wave, for about six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and a photograph to close a black stuff image;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] No. 1 of the General Traffic Accident No. 1 (Bodily Injury resulting from Traffic Accidents) (amended by Act No. 4 months to 10 months) of the basic area (amended by Act No. 10) [Judgment of sentencing] of the Defendant, by negligence, commits an injury to the victims who driven by

arrow